ROI – More Sense than Dollars
September 27, 2010 3 Comments
Author: Hamish Anderson
As most marketers will know, getting approval to undertake anything marketing related – especially in a tight economy, or where the campaign represents a departure from ‘The norm’ – can be next to impossible. However, it is time that marketers were given licence to perform again, but with redefined principles of success. Furthermore, I believe that online and converged marketing represents an ideal way to allow marketers to achieve this success. I can imagine that when many of you read this you will think I am advocating that it is ok to invest money in online marketing without seeing a return. But I can assure you that is not what I am saying. In fact I am a firm believer in the premise that all online marketing should generate a return on investment. However, it is the measure of what ROI is defined as that I believe needs clarification, especially as regards online marketing.
Re-defining ROI
If you look up marketing text books or do an online search you will find the general definition of ROI expressed as “income produced by an asset divided by its investment cost, expressed as a percentage”. I believe that for the most part this is true, however, there is one word in this definition which I believe needs to be revised – “Income”. Given that today’s marketing medium’s (especially online) allow much more transparent analysis of the effect of certain campaigns, the scope of measured returns should be much broader than the current definition allows. That is right; I am asserting that ROI should not be purely measured by income produced. In defence of my position, let me put this to you: Time is a capital resource – a valuable resource –which is why companies ask employees to keep timesheets. Given it is so valuable, and given we can compute its relative value; should we not also look to measure if an investment has had a positive impact by looking at time based calculations? This is especially important given that some marketing activities have a lag period between implementation and return.
Time Calculations for ROI
Let me give you an example. Let’s assume you undertake to make social media part of your ongoing strategy. This activity takes say, 10 hours aggregate a week. In undertaking this activity, you promote key aspects of the business, and you increase your market awareness. And as a direct result of the activity you increase transactions with the business by ‘x’ amount. This may or may not be enough to alone justify investment into social media going forward. But what if you compare the time spent undertaking social marketing to achieve ‘x’ sales as compared to other traditional marketing forms which generate similar levels of business? Does the time invested by comparison represent an increase in time or a decrease? If it represents a saving, meaning the difference in time can be applied to other activities without increasing costs, effectively increasing your marketing potential, then the return on the initial time investment is indeed worthwhile.
Applying Common Sense
It seems that marketers and finance departments need to sit down and redefine some key principles which affect both internal departments. Both departments are looking to achieve the same goal – company growth and profitability – however, as is the case in too many companies, they cannot reach agreement about how to achieve it in the best way. If marketers and finance teams can sit down and redefine the principles of what constitutes success, and agree that marketing activities are now more than ever able to demonstrate their impact, from both a time and dollar perspective, then perhaps a new era in marketing growth can be achieved. All it is going to take is an understanding that is as much about common sense as it is about dollars as there should be no reason that marketing creativity and fiscal responsibility cannot go hand in hand.